Resource Lesson
Gravitational Energy Wells
Printer Friendly Version
Warped Space and Orbital Paths
In his
General Theory of Relativity
(1916) Einstein suggested that Newton's “gravitational fields” should be replaced with the warping of spacetime around massive celestial objects. His rationale was based on the fact that he did not approve of the concept of “action at a distance” - a mechanism that is fundamental to fields. This concept would require that interactions occurring in one location in a field would require that information be sent "instantaneously" throughout the remainder of the field requiring speeds that exceeded the speed of light - Einstein's universal speed limit.
image courtesy of
Guide to the Cosmos
Often used to model spacetime around a massive object a stretched or hyperbolically curved surface. Envision a circular rubber sheet stretched tightly about a circular hoop. When a massive ball is placed on its surface, a “gravitational well” is immediately created.
image courtesy of
Gravity Visualized
If a second, lighter mass, is released with a velocity tangent to the center of the well (along a gravitational equipotential) it will attempt to travel in a straight line path. However, the
distortion of spacetime
through which it is moving will result in the object orbiting the central celestial body and eventually spiraling down as it loses energy. Under ideal conditions smaller objects should maintain a circular orbit with a constant period.
image courtesy of
The Stand News
We say that orbiting satellites are trapped in an "energy well" created by the more passive parent body distorting spacetime in its immediate vicinity. To obtain the total energy of an orbiting satellite we must add its potential and kinetic energies.
Gravitational Potential Energy
Let's first examine a satellite's potential energy. The potential energy function used for distances that exceed 1.2 radii from the center of a celestial body is
In the formula, the negative preceding the ratio indicates that on astronomical scales the potential energy of a satellite is negative until it reaches infinity where it approaches zero. In the graph shown below, the three curves represents a satellite's kinetic energy (blue), its potential energy (orange), and its total energy (green). Note the linearity of the potential energy function inside the highlighted box.
Recall that the gravitational field strength of the Earth is given by
The potential energy at the surface of the earth is
As mentioned earlier, due to the almost linear nature of our graph near the planet's surface, we can approximate the potential energy for small heights (h<< R
_{E}
) above the earth's surface as
The change in potential energy for a falling mass would be
Refer to the following information for the next four questions.
6.4 x 10
^{6}
meters. The mass of the Earth equals 5.98 x 10
^{24}
kg.
Calculate U(6.403200 x 10
^{6}
) using the formula U(r) = -GmM/r.
Calculate U(6.400000 x 10
^{6}
) using the formula U(r) = -GmM/r.
Calculate
Δ
U = U(6.403200 x 10
^{6}
) - U(6.400000 x 10
^{6}
)
Calculate the gravitational potential energy at a height of 3200 meters above the surface of the earth using the formula PE
_{g}
= mgh.
Upon inspection you can see that we should only use the expression U(r) = PE
_{g}
= mgh to calculate an object’s gravitational potential energy when it is located close to the surface of the central body. Such as an apple falling from a tree branch or a projectile released from a cliff. Not satellites in orbit.
Kinetic Energy and Total Energy
As stated earlier, when asked to calculate the total energy of an orbiting satellite you must include both its gravitational potential energy and its kinetic energy. We use the relationship that the gravitational force between the central body (planet/star) and the satellite provides the satellite's centripetal force to derive an expression for the satellite's kinetic energy,
Combining the two expressions of U(r) and KE(r) gives us the satellite's total energy.
Notice that the satellite's total energy is negative. This tells us that the satellite is "trapped" in an energy well around the central planet. Like an electron "orbiting" its central nucleus, the satellite would require a minimum "ionization energy" to free it from the influence of the central celestial body.
If a satellite were to lose all of its translational kinetic energy (that is, its tangential velocity) then the satellite would plunge down towards the central body's surface. It would impact the surface with a kinetic energy equal in magnitude to its original gravitational potential energy.
Refer to the following information for the next two questions.
The mass of the moon is 7.342 x 10
^{22}
kg and its average orbital radius is 3.844 x 10
^{8}
meters from the center of the earth.
Calculate the total energy of the moon as it orbits the Earth.
If the moon were to be struck by a meteorite that resulted in its total loss of linear momentum, at what speed would fragments of the moon impact the Earth's surface?
Related Documents
Lab:
Labs -
A Battering Ram
Labs -
A Photoelectric Effect Analogy
Labs -
A Physical Pendulum, The Parallel Axis Theorem and A Bit of Calculus
Labs -
Air Track Collisions
Labs -
Ballistic Pendulum
Labs -
Ballistic Pendulum: Muzzle Velocity
Labs -
Bouncing Steel Spheres
Labs -
Calculation of "g" Using Two Types of Pendulums
Labs -
Coefficient of Friction
Labs -
Coefficient of Friction
Labs -
Collision Pendulum: Muzzle Velocity
Labs -
Conical Pendulums
Labs -
Conical Pendulums
Labs -
Conservation of Energy and Vertical Circles
Labs -
Conservation of Momentum in Two-Dimensions
Labs -
Falling Coffee Filters
Labs -
Force Table - Force Vectors in Equilibrium
Labs -
Gravitational Field Strength
Labs -
Inelastic Collision - Velocity of a Softball
Labs -
Inertial Mass
Labs -
Introductory Simple Pendulums
Labs -
Kepler's 1st and 2nd Laws
Labs -
Lab: Triangle Measurements
Labs -
LabPro: Newton's 2nd Law
Labs -
Loop-the-Loop
Labs -
Mars' Lab
Labs -
Mass of a Rolling Cart
Labs -
Moment of Inertia of a Bicycle Wheel
Labs -
Oscillating Springs
Labs -
Ramps: Sliding vs Rolling
Labs -
Relationship Between Tension in a String and Wave Speed
Labs -
Relationship Between Tension in a String and Wave Speed Along the String
Labs -
Roller Coaster, Projectile Motion, and Energy
Labs -
Rotational Inertia
Labs -
Rube Goldberg Challenge
Labs -
Sand Springs
Labs -
Simple Pendulums: Class Data
Labs -
Simple Pendulums: LabPro Data
Labs -
Spring Carts
Labs -
Static Equilibrium Lab
Labs -
Static Springs: Hooke's Law
Labs -
Static Springs: Hooke's Law
Labs -
Static Springs: LabPro Data for Hooke's Law
Labs -
Target Lab: Ball Bearing Rolling Down an Inclined Plane
Labs -
Terminal Velocity
Labs -
Video LAB: A Gravitron
Labs -
Video LAB: Ball Re-Bounding From a Wall
Labs -
Video Lab: Blowdart Colliding with Cart
Labs -
Video LAB: Circular Motion
Labs -
Video Lab: Falling Coffee Filters
Labs -
Video LAB: Looping Rollercoaster
Labs -
Video Lab: M&M Collides with Pop Can
Labs -
Video Lab: Marble Collides with Ballistic Pendulum
Labs -
Water Springs
Resource Lesson:
RL -
A Derivation of the Formulas for Centripetal Acceleration
RL -
Advanced Gravitational Forces
RL -
Advanced Satellites
RL -
Air Resistance
RL -
Air Resistance: Terminal Velocity
RL -
APC: Work Notation
RL -
Centripetal Acceleration and Angular Motion
RL -
Conservation of Energy and Springs
RL -
Derivation of Bohr's Model for the Hydrogen Spectrum
RL -
Derivation: Period of a Simple Pendulum
RL -
Energy Conservation in Simple Pendulums
RL -
Forces Acting at an Angle
RL -
Freebody Diagrams
RL -
Gravitational Potential Energy
RL -
Inclined Planes
RL -
Inertial vs Gravitational Mass
RL -
Kepler's Laws
RL -
LC Circuit
RL -
Magnetic Forces on Particles (Part II)
RL -
Mechanical Energy
RL -
Momentum and Energy
RL -
Newton's Laws of Motion
RL -
Non-constant Resistance Forces
RL -
Period of a Pendulum
RL -
Potential Energy Functions
RL -
Principal of Least Action
RL -
Properties of Friction
RL -
Rotational Dynamics: Pivoting Rods
RL -
Rotational Kinematics
RL -
Rotational Kinetic Energy
RL -
SHM Equations
RL -
Simple Harmonic Motion
RL -
Springs and Blocks
RL -
Springs: Hooke's Law
RL -
Static Equilibrium
RL -
Symmetries in Physics
RL -
Systems of Bodies
RL -
Tension Cases: Four Special Situations
RL -
The Law of Universal Gravitation
RL -
Thin Rods: Moment of Inertia
RL -
Uniform Circular Motion: Centripetal Forces
RL -
Universal Gravitation and Satellites
RL -
Universal Gravitation and Weight
RL -
Vertical Circles and Non-Uniform Circular Motion
RL -
What is Mass?
RL -
Work
RL -
Work and Energy
Review:
REV -
Review: Circular Motion and Universal Gravitation
Worksheet:
APP -
Big Al
APP -
Big Fist
APP -
Family Reunion
APP -
Ring Around the Collar
APP -
The Antelope
APP -
The Box Seat
APP -
The Jogger
APP -
The Pepsi Challenge
APP -
The Pet Rock
APP -
The Pool Game
APP -
The Satellite
APP -
The Spring Phling
APP -
Timex
CP -
Action-Reaction #1
CP -
Action-Reaction #2
CP -
Centripetal Acceleration
CP -
Centripetal Force
CP -
Conservation of Energy
CP -
Equilibrium on an Inclined Plane
CP -
Falling and Air Resistance
CP -
Force and Acceleration
CP -
Force and Weight
CP -
Force Vectors and the Parallelogram Rule
CP -
Freebody Diagrams
CP -
Gravitational Interactions
CP -
Incline Places: Force Vector Resultants
CP -
Incline Planes - Force Vector Components
CP -
Inertia
CP -
Mobiles: Rotational Equilibrium
CP -
Momentum and Energy
CP -
Momentum and Kinetic Energy
CP -
Net Force
CP -
Newton's Law of Motion: Friction
CP -
Power Production
CP -
Satellites: Circular and Elliptical
CP -
Static Equilibrium
CP -
Tensions and Equilibrium
CP -
Work and Energy
NT -
Acceleration
NT -
Air Resistance #1
NT -
An Apple on a Table
NT -
Apex #1
NT -
Apex #2
NT -
Circular Orbits
NT -
Cliffs
NT -
Elliptical Orbits
NT -
Escape Velocity
NT -
Falling Rock
NT -
Falling Spheres
NT -
Friction
NT -
Frictionless Pulley
NT -
Gravitation #1
NT -
Gravitation #2
NT -
Head-on Collisions #1
NT -
Head-on Collisions #2
NT -
Ice Boat
NT -
Pendulum
NT -
Ramps
NT -
Rotating Disk
NT -
Sailboats #1
NT -
Sailboats #2
NT -
Satellite Positions
NT -
Scale Reading
NT -
Settling
NT -
Skidding Distances
NT -
Spiral Tube
NT -
Tensile Strength
NT -
Terminal Velocity
NT -
Tug of War #1
NT -
Tug of War #2
NT -
Two-block Systems
WS -
Advanced Properties of Freely Falling Bodies #1
WS -
Advanced Properties of Freely Falling Bodies #2
WS -
Advanced Properties of Freely Falling Bodies #3
WS -
Basic Practice with Springs
WS -
Calculating Force Components
WS -
Charged Projectiles in Uniform Electric Fields
WS -
Combining Kinematics and Dynamics
WS -
Distinguishing 2nd and 3rd Law Forces
WS -
Energy Methods: More Practice with Projectiles
WS -
Energy Methods: Projectiles
WS -
Energy/Work Vocabulary
WS -
Force vs Displacement Graphs
WS -
Freebody Diagrams #1
WS -
Freebody Diagrams #2
WS -
Freebody Diagrams #3
WS -
Freebody Diagrams #4
WS -
Inertial Mass Lab Review Questions
WS -
Introduction to Springs
WS -
Kepler's Laws: Worksheet #1
WS -
Kepler's Laws: Worksheet #2
WS -
Kinematics Along With Work/Energy
WS -
Lab Discussion: Gravitational Field Strength and the Acceleration Due to Gravity
WS -
Lab Discussion: Inertial and Gravitational Mass
WS -
More Practice with SHM Equations
WS -
net F = ma
WS -
Parallel Reading - The Atom
WS -
Pendulum Lab Review
WS -
Pendulum Lab Review
WS -
Potential Energy Functions
WS -
Practice: Momentum and Energy #1
WS -
Practice: Momentum and Energy #2
WS -
Practice: SHM Equations
WS -
Practice: Uniform Circular Motion
WS -
Practice: Vertical Circular Motion
WS -
Ropes and Pulleys in Static Equilibrium
WS -
Rotational Kinetic Energy
WS -
SHM Properties
WS -
Standard Model: Particles and Forces
WS -
Static Springs: The Basics
WS -
Universal Gravitation and Satellites
WS -
Vertical Circular Motion #1
WS -
Vocabulary for Newton's Laws
WS -
Work and Energy Practice: An Assortment of Situations
WS -
Work and Energy Practice: Forces at Angles
TB -
Centripetal Acceleration
TB -
Centripetal Force
TB -
Systems of Bodies (including pulleys)
TB -
Work, Power, Kinetic Energy
PhysicsLAB
Copyright © 1997-2017
Catharine H. Colwell
All rights reserved.
Application Programmer
Mark Acton